the Wall, We Are Right
There With You
Quick answer: If you were served with a California restraining order and did not appear at the hearing, the judge can hear the petitioner’s evidence without you and issue a restraining order that lasts up to five years. That is often called a default restraining order. It is enforceable immediately and is entered into the statewide law enforcement database. You can ask the same court to set it aside, most commonly under Code of Civil Procedure § 473(b), which requires a showing of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect and must be filed within a reasonable time and no later than six months. If you were never properly served, the order may be void. Other options, each with a shorter deadline, include a motion for reconsideration (10 days), a motion for new trial (15 days), and an appeal (generally 60 days). Until a judge changes the order, you must obey it.
California restraining order statutes do not use the word default. The term describes an order after hearing that was granted when the respondent did not file a response and did not appear. The hearing is short. The judge confirms from the proof of service that the respondent received the petition, any temporary restraining order, and the notice of hearing, then takes brief testimony from the petitioner and decides whether the standard is met. For a domestic violence restraining order, that standard is a preponderance of the evidence. For a civil harassment restraining order, it is clear and convincing evidence. See burden of proof in California restraining order cases.
With no cross-examination and no competing evidence, most uncontested requests are granted, and they are often granted for the maximum term and with every order the petitioner asked for, including stay-away distances, move-out orders, custody and visitation terms in domestic violence cases, and firearm prohibitions.
A court can issue a restraining order after hearing only if the respondent had notice. In most cases that means personal service of the petition, the notice of hearing, and any temporary order, generally at least five days before the hearing unless the judge shortened the time. Get a copy of the court file and read the proof of service (form DV-200, CH-200, or the equivalent). Check:
If service did not happen as described, the order may be void for lack of notice, and the six-month limit in § 473(b) is not the only path. See improper service of a restraining order.
A related point: when a respondent was personally served with the temporary order and notice but did not appear, and the final order matches the temporary order except for the expiration date, the law allows the final order to be served by mail (Fam. Code § 6384). Many people first learn that a five-year order exists when it arrives in an envelope, or when an officer mentions it during a traffic stop.
| Option | Legal basis | Deadline | Best used when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motion to set aside for mistake or excusable neglect | Code Civ. Proc. § 473(b) | Within a reasonable time, and no more than 6 months after the order | You were served but missed the hearing for a reason a careful person might have |
| Motion to set aside a void order | Code Civ. Proc. § 473(d) | No fixed period if the defect appears on the face of the record. Otherwise act promptly. | You were never served, or service was defective |
| Motion based on lack of actual notice | Code Civ. Proc. § 473.5 and the court’s equitable power | Within a reasonable time. The statute’s outer limits are 2 years after entry or 180 days after service of notice of entry, whichever is earlier. | Papers were delivered in a way that never actually reached you |
| Equitable relief for extrinsic fraud or mistake | Court’s inherent power (Rappleyea v. Campbell (1994) 8 Cal.4th 975) | No statutory limit, but diligence is required | The six months have passed and you were kept from participating through no fault of your own |
| Motion for reconsideration | Code Civ. Proc. § 1008 | 10 days after service of notice of entry | There are new or different facts or law |
| Motion for new trial | Code Civ. Proc. §§ 657, 659 | Generally 15 days after notice of entry | Irregularity, surprise, or insufficient evidence |
| Appeal | Code Civ. Proc. § 904.1(a)(6); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.104 | Generally 60 days after service of notice of entry, 180 days at the outside | There is a legal error visible in the record |
| Request to modify or terminate | Fam. Code § 6345; Code Civ. Proc. § 533 | Any time while the order is in effect | Circumstances have materially changed since the order was issued |
Deadlines are strict and some run from events that are easy to miss, such as the date a notice was mailed. Confirm the dates in your own file with counsel.
Section 473(b) lets a court relieve a party from an order taken against that party through “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” California courts apply the statute liberally because the law prefers that cases be decided on their merits, but the moving party carries the burden. A complete motion has four parts.
In family court, the motion is typically brought on a Request for Order. In civil harassment, workplace violence, and elder abuse cases it is a noticed motion in the civil department. The petitioner must be served and will have a chance to oppose it. If the judge grants the motion, the usual result is that the default order is vacated, a temporary order stays in place, and a new contested hearing is scheduled.
| More likely to be excused | Less likely to be excused |
|---|---|
| Medical emergency or hospitalization with records | Deciding the case was not serious |
| Being in custody on the hearing date | Oversleeping or routine traffic with no documentation |
| A documented calendaring error, such as the wrong date on a notice or in a text from a clerk or lawyer | Ignoring papers that were handed to you |
| Going to the wrong courthouse or department and promptly trying to fix it | Waiting months after learning of the order |
| Limited English proficiency combined with real confusion about the papers | Relying on the petitioner’s statement that the case would be dropped, without confirming with the court |
That last scenario is common. A petitioner says the request will be withdrawn, the respondent stays home, and the petitioner appears and obtains the order. Depending on the proof, such as text messages, this may support relief on the ground of surprise or extrinsic fraud. It should never be relied on in advance. Only a judge can end a restraining order case.
A default order carries the same consequences as one issued after a full trial. It appears in CLETS, it prohibits firearm possession for its full term, and it can affect employment, professional licensing, immigration applications, and housing. A domestic violence restraining order also triggers a presumption against custody under Family Code § 3044. See consequences of a restraining order and how DVROs affect custody.
There is also a renewal problem. In the last three months before a domestic violence order expires, the protected person may ask to renew it for five or more years or permanently, without showing any new abuse. A respondent who never contested the original order begins the renewal hearing with unchallenged findings already in the file.
When no timely motion is available, the remaining routes are a request to terminate or modify the order based on a material change in circumstances, and opposing renewal when the order nears expiration. On a termination request, the restrained person carries the burden of showing that the order is no longer justified (Loeffler v. Medina (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1495). Changed circumstances can include a long period of full compliance, relocation, the end of any shared custody or workplace connection, or the protected person’s agreement. See modifying or terminating a DVRO.
A restraining order after hearing is appealable. An appeal is decided on the record made in the trial court, and after a default that record contains only the petitioner’s side. Appeals from defaults tend to succeed on issues such as lack of notice, an order that exceeds what the petition requested, or a statutory requirement that was not met. For most respondents the stronger sequence is a prompt trial court motion, with a notice of appeal filed in time to preserve review if the motion is denied. An order denying a § 473 motion is itself appealable. See restraining order appeals.
Everything on this page is harder than attending the hearing. If you cannot be ready, or cannot physically be there, you have alternatives:
A respondent is personally served, calendars the hearing, and is admitted to a hospital two days before it. The court grants a five-year order in the respondent’s absence. This is the classic case for relief under § 473(b). The motion should be filed within weeks, supported by admission and discharge records, a declaration, and the proposed response with defense evidence.
A respondent learns of an order during a traffic stop. The proof of service says papers were handed to the respondent at an address the respondent left a year earlier. Here the primary argument is that the order is void for lack of notice. Evidence that the respondent lived and worked elsewhere on the date of supposed service, such as a lease, pay records, or location data, is the core of the motion.
The petitioner texts that the request will be withdrawn, and the respondent does not attend. The petitioner appears and obtains the order. The respondent should move promptly on the grounds of surprise and extrinsic fraud or mistake, attaching the messages. Courts take a close look at whether relying on the other side’s word was reasonable, which is why this should never be relied on before a hearing.
In each scenario, the judge will also want to know that a new hearing could come out differently, and that the respondent has obeyed the order since learning of it.
If you were properly served and do not appear, the judge can hold the hearing without you and grant a restraining order based on the petitioner’s evidence alone. The order can last up to five years in domestic violence, civil harassment, and elder abuse cases and is enforceable as soon as it is issued.
A judge generally cannot issue a restraining order after hearing against a person who was never served with notice of the hearing. If an order was entered without valid service, it can be challenged as void. Courts may authorize alternative methods of service in limited circumstances, so review the proof of service in the court file.
A motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b) must be filed within a reasonable time and no later than six months after the order. A motion for reconsideration is due within 10 days, a motion for new trial generally within 15 days, and a notice of appeal generally within 60 days of service of notice of entry. File as early as possible, because delay itself can defeat the motion.
Courts look for mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, meaning the kind of error a reasonably prudent person could make. Documented hospitalization, a calendaring error supported by evidence, being in custody, or never receiving notice are examples. Simply deciding not to attend is not excusable.
Yes. The order remains in full effect until a judge vacates, modifies, or terminates it. Violating it during that time can lead to arrest and prosecution under Penal Code section 273.6.
Once you learn of the order and its terms, you must comply. Lack of knowledge may be a defense to a past alleged violation, but it does not give permission to ignore the order going forward.
You can, but the order will remain in law enforcement databases for its full term, firearm restrictions will continue, and the protected person can ask to renew it. In domestic violence cases a renewal can be for five or more years or permanent.
If the person who asked for the order does not appear, the court will usually deny the request and the temporary restraining order ends. The respondent should still attend to make sure that happens and to obtain a copy of the minute order.
Yes, a restraining order after hearing is an appealable order. An appeal from a default is limited to the record that was before the trial judge, so it is usually paired with, or follows, a motion in the trial court that explains why you were absent.
Yes. A respondent is generally entitled to one continuance as a matter of course for a reasonable period to respond, and the court can grant more time for good cause. Asking for a continuance is almost always better than not appearing.
Power Trial Lawyers represents respondents in restraining order cases throughout Southern California, at the trial court level and on appeal. If an order was entered in your absence, the deadlines began running on a date you may not even know yet. Contact the firm to discuss your case.
This page provides general information about California restraining order procedure. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Deadlines depend on the facts and documents in each case. Confirm details with the court and with counsel about your situation. Reviewed by Matthew Barhoma, Esq., Power Trial Lawyers. Last updated November 2026.