Justia Badge
LACBA Badge
Avvo Clients Choice Award 2018
The State Bar of California
Best Lawyers
Lawyers of Distinction
Super Lawyers - Matthew Barhoma 2022
Super Lawyers - Matthew Barhoma Rising Stars
Court TV
Forbes
Fox News
KTLA 5
Law & Crime Trial Network
People
Top 40
Yahoo News
Los Angeles Times

Firearms & Weapons Defense in Southern California

If you or a loved one was arrested, searched, or contacted by law enforcement about a gun, call Power Trial Lawyers now at (888) 808-2179. When your freedom and your rights are on the line, you need a California gun charge lawyer who moves fast, knows the local courts, and knows how to win.

Southern California has some of the strictest and most complex firearms laws in the nation. A routine traffic stop can turn into a loaded-gun case; a family dispute can trigger a restraining-order-related firearm prohibition; a parts-ordering hobby can be mistaken for “ghost gun” manufacturing; moving here from a friendlier state can lead to assault-weapon allegations. These are high-stakes cases with real exposure to jail or prison, immigration consequences, loss of professional licenses, and lifetime bans on gun ownership. When the stakes are this high, you need an experienced firearm defense attorney California defendants trust, and a weapons charges lawyer who’s battle-tested in local courtrooms.

Power Trial Lawyers is a premier criminal practice and appellate firm built for high-stakes cases. We defend every category of weapons allegation—from conceal-carry and loaded-gun charges to prohibited-person possession, assault-weapon accusations, ammunition or magazine issues, ghost-gun allegations, and more. If you are searching for a California criminal defense attorney or a criminal lawyer with elite firearms experience, you’re in the right place.

Southern California Criminal and Restraining Order Defense Lawyers--Power Trial Lawyers

What Counts as a “Firearms or Weapons” Case in California?

“Firearms & weapons” covers a wide range of statutes and scenarios. Here are common charges we see across Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Imperial, and Kern Counties:

  • Carrying a concealed handgun (Penal Code § 25400) — the statute that criminalizes concealing a concealable firearm in a vehicle or on the person. Penalties and enhancements depend on factors like prior convictions, stolen status, or registration. 
  • Carrying a loaded firearm in public (Penal Code § 25850) — applies to any loaded firearm in a public place or public street, with felony exposure in certain circumstances.
  • Felon or prohibited person in possession (Penal Code § 29800) — a felony for people with specified convictions or statuses to own, possess, purchase, or receive any firearm. 
  • Assault weapons & .50 BMG rifles: possession (PC § 30605) and manufacturing/import/sale/transport (PC § 30600). Possession and distribution activities are treated differently; both carry serious consequences. 
  • Gun-violence restraining order (GVRO) overlaps — emergency or civil orders that can temporarily bar possession and require prompt relinquishment; violating related orders can trigger separate criminal exposure. 

Many of these statutes are “wobblers” or have enhancement paths, meaning the same basic conduct can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony depending on facts the prosecutor chooses to emphasize. That is why engaging a California gun charge lawyer early is critical—pre-filing advocacy and charge-screening can make or break outcomes.

Prosecutors Must Prove Specific Elements (And We Know Where They Break)

Every weapons statute has elements the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. A seasoned firearm defense attorney California judges know and respect will pressure-test each element:

  • Possession: actual vs. constructive vs. joint; who controlled the gun, where it was found, who knew it was there.
  • Knowledge/Intent: Did you know it was a firearm? Did you know it was loaded? Did you know it had features that might classify it as an “assault weapon”?
  • Location/Status: Was the gun in a “public place”? Were you a prohibited person? Were you lawfully transporting or storing it?
  • Search & Seizure: Was there probable cause? Was consent valid? Was the stop pretextual? Did officers overreach (e.g., opening containers, prying into locked cases, or exceeding the scope of a traffic stop)?

Our weapons charges lawyer team builds suppression motions, evidentiary challenges, and factual defenses from day one. That pressure often drives better offers, dismissals, or charge reductions.

Where We Defend: Counties and Courthouses Across Southern California

We appear throughout Los Angeles CountyOrange CountySan Diego CountyRiverside CountySan Bernardino CountyVentura CountySanta Barbara CountySan Luis Obispo CountyImperial County, and Kern County. Representative major courthouses include:

Local knowledge matters. Each courthouse has its own tendencies, fast-track programs, and negotiating cultures. A California gun charge lawyer who knows these rooms knows the difference between a teaching moment and a trial moment.

Immediate Next Steps (Do These Now)

  1. Stop talking to police. You have the right to remain silent and to counsel. Use it.
  2. Call Power Trial Lawyers at (888) 808-2179. Within hours, we can contact the agency, protect your rights, and start building the record.
  3. Preserve evidence. Photos of where items were found, body-cam or surveillance, GPS/vehicle telematics, purchase paperwork, CCW documentation, range receipts—save it all.
  4. Identify witnesses. Who was present? Who can speak to ownership, knowledge, or lawful transport?
  5. Don’t post or text about the case. Social content and messages are discoverable.
  6. Write yourself a timeline. While it’s fresh, capture the stop, statements, what was searched, and who said what. Share it only with your criminal lawyer team.

A fast, disciplined response sets up your firearm defense attorney California to win key battles early—before charges get locked in.

Step-By-Step Guide: How to Get Counsel and Protect Yourself in a California Firearms Case

Step 1 — Triage the situation

  • Are you detained, out on citation, or facing a warrant?
  • What was seized? What did you say (if anything)?
  • Did officers claim probable cause from odor, “bulge,” “furtive movements,” or “high-crime area” patter? Document it.

Step 2 — Retain the right team

  • Choose a California gun charge lawyer with deep suppression-motion experience. Ask about wins in your courthouse.
  • Confirm you’ll get senior-lawyer involvement on search issues, not just a file-handler.
  • Ask how the firm integrates investigators, expert witnesses (firearms classification, forensic examination), and in-house briefing for aggressive motions.

Step 3 — Lock down the paper trail

  • Gather bills of sale, DOJ registration history, CCW permits, NRA or range memberships, certificates of training, lockbox receipts, and any repair/shipping paperwork.
  • If someone else owned or placed the firearm, identify them for your weapons charges lawyer.

Step 4 — Demand discovery immediately

  • Police reports, CAD/dispatch logs, body-worn camera, dash-cam, tow-inventory docs, property report, lab reports, chain-of-custody records, and any firearm classification/testing.

Step 5 — Evaluate charge exposure by statute

  • Concealed (PC 25400), loaded (PC 25850), possession by prohibited person (PC 29800), assault weapon rules (PC 30605/30600), large-capacity magazines, unserialized frames/receivers, short-barreled rifle/shotgun, silencers, and GVRO violations. We map exposure and diversion paths. 

Step 6 — Build the suppression roadmap

  • Challenge the stop, detention, frisk, search of containers/locked cases, vehicle “inventory” searches, and any consent that was coerced or beyond scope.
  • Attack credibility where needed; demand all recordings; scrutinize timelines.

Step 7 — Pre-filing advocacy

  • In the right offices, we approach filing deputies with a tight memo, proof of lawful conduct, and evidentiary weaknesses. The goal: no file, reject-and-return, or reduced counts. This is where a nimble firearm defense attorney California can save months of litigation.

Step 8 — Negotiate from a position of strength

  • We leverage suppression issues, evidentiary holes, and equities (employment, licensure, care-taking) to pursue diversion, deferred entry, or non-firearm resolutions.

Step 9 — Prepare for litigation

  • If the case must be fought, we’re trial-ready. Jury selection in weapons cases demands careful issue-framing; we simplify the statute and expose unreliable “training and experience” testimony.

Step 10 — Preserve appellate issues

  • Every objection and ruling is preserved to protect you on appeal or post-conviction (where our firm also excels). If trial isn’t the best path, we know how to position the case for the best post-filing outcomes.

What’s at Stake (And Why Speed Wins)

  • Custody exposure: Some weapons charges carry mandatory minimums or felony-level punishment depending on priors or firearm features. (See PC 25400, 25850, 29800, 30605/30600 for the framework.) 
  • Immigration: Firearms convictions can be removable offenses; even some misdemeanors trigger severe consequences.
  • Licensing & employment: Healthcare, financial, government-cleared, and public-safety roles are acutely impacted.
  • Firearm rights: Prohibitions can last years—or life—depending on the statute and outcome.
  • Collateral orders: GVROs and criminal protective orders can impose immediate surrender and prohibitions. 

When your future is on the line, choose a California gun charge lawyer who does more than “hold hands.” We move evidence, move deadlines, and move prosecutors.

Defense Playbooks That Win Firearms Cases

Every case is unique, but winning strategies repeat. Our California gun charge lawyer team structures your defense around four pressure points:

  1. Stop/Detention Legality
    If police lacked reasonable suspicion to stop you (or unlawfully prolonged a traffic stop), the downstream search collapses. We mine CAD logs, BWC, and radio traffic for timeline breaks and inconsistent narratives.
  2. Scope of Search
    Many gun cases hinge on what officers could lawfully open: glove boxes, center consoles, zipped bags, locked cases, or trunks. We challenge any claim that an “inventory search” or “officer safety sweep” justified rummaging.
  3. Knowledge & Dominion
    Prosecutors must tie you to the firearm: fingerprints, DNA, admissions, or exclusive control. With passengers, rideshares, borrowed cars, or multiple roommates, possession is often ambiguous. A seasoned firearm defense attorney California jurors respect will show how thin “constructive possession” really is.
  4. Classification & Features
    Assault-weapon allegations require precise proof of features or models. Feature-based cases (pistol grip + detachable magazine; fixed magazine capacity; folding stock; flash suppressor) spawn expert battles. Misclassification happens, and our experts can dismantle it.

Our weapons charges lawyer team brings in metallurgical, ballistics, and gunsmith experts when needed, and we do hands-on inspections—no paper-only defenses.

Scenario-Based Strategies (What We Do Differently)

Traffic-Stop Discoveries: PC 25400 vs. PC 25850

  • PC 25400 (concealed firearm in vehicle/on person): the issue is concealment and knowing possession.
  • PC 25850 (loaded firearm in public): the issue is a loaded firearm in a public place.
    firearm defense attorney California courts respect will separate “a gun existed” from “the statute’s elements were met.”

Common pressure points

  1. Reason for the stop and its duration
    • Was there reasonable suspicion for the stop?
    • Did the stop morph into unrelated questioning or a prolonged detention without new facts?
    • CAD/dispatch logs and body-worn camera (BWC) often reveal timeline creep.
  2. “Container doctrine” and scope
    • Center consoles, backpacks, zipped bags, and locked cases implicate different consent and scope rules.
    • Consent must be voluntary and limited; “yes” to look in the car is not automatically “yes” to pry open a locked case.
  3. “Plain view” limits
    • True plain view does not require manipulation, repositioning, or intrusion.
    • If the vantage point changed or a container was moved to “create” plain view, suppression may be litigated.
  4. Admissions and “safety” patter
    • Statements like “it’s just a range bag” or “there might be ammo” may be contested for Miranda or voluntariness.

What a defense team typically pursues

Vehicle telematics, tow-inventory paperwork, and third-party witness declarations that re-frame “possession” and “knowledge.”

Targeted Penal Code § 1538.5 motions to suppress; exclusion of items or statements; charge reductions to non-gun dispositions when appropriate.

Home or Apartment Searches: Warrants, Consent, and Device Drifts

What prosecutors must justify

  • Warrant sufficiency: particularity, nexus to the home, and timeliness of information.
  • Consent: who gave it, whether they had actual or apparent authority, and the scope (e.g., bedroom safe vs. common areas).
  • Protective sweeps: limited, articulable safety concerns—not a license to rummage.
  • Device overreach: phone/computer searches must remain within warrant limits; “we looked for contacts and found gun photos” invites challenge.

Defense map

  • Examine affidavits for boilerplate “training and experience” without facts.
  • Challenge third-party consent to locked containers or private rooms.
  • Seek carve-out orders excluding particular items if the warrant was partially valid but overbroad.

Potential courtroom paths

  • Suppression of overreached areas; partial suppression; evidentiary limitations. An experienced weapons charges lawyer will calibrate the remedy sought to the flaw found—without overstating outcomes.

Out-of-State Transport & New California Residents

The recurring story
A recent mover brings lawfully owned firearms and accessories from a more permissive state and is stopped or contacted before understanding California’s feature-based and registration rules.

Defense angles often explored

  • Good-faith compliance efforts: lockboxes, range memberships, safety training, purchase records, shipping receipts.
  • Feature/classification disputes: whether the configuration actually met “assault weapon” definitions at the relevant time.
  • Human factors: education, employment, lack of prior record—context that can influence charging and resolution.

“Ghost Gun” / Unserialized Frames & Receivers

Unserialized frames and receivers—often called “ghost guns”—sit at the intersection of fast-changing regulations and technical firearm classifications. Cases in this area frequently turn on definitions, timing, and proof of knowledge. A California gun charge lawyer will drill into when a part becomes a “firearm,” whether serialization was required for your specific item at a specific time, and how law enforcement tested or restored markings.

Plain-English Primer: When Does a Part Become a “Firearm”?

California law focuses on whether a frame or receiver is sufficiently complete to function as the core component of a firearm or be readily convertible to that status. In practice, the line is not always obvious. Defense evaluation typically looks at:

  • State of completion at the time of seizure (unfinished blank vs. milled and drilled).
  • Presence of jigs, templates, or tool operations indicating final steps were completed or imminent.
  • 3D-printed components and whether the printed item meets dimensional and durability thresholds to operate as a receiver.
  • Timing: whether serialization or marking requirements applied when the part was obtained, modified, or possessed.

Because these determinations are fact-specific, a firearm defense attorney California courts hear from regularly will anchor the analysis to your timeline and the exact configuration seized.

Key Questions a Defense Team Will Ask

  • Status: At the moment police recovered it, did the part meet the legal definition of a firearm or receiver?
  • Serialization: If serialization/marking was required, what deadline applied, and had you started the process (applications, engraver appointments, vendor notices)?
  • Testing & Classification: What procedures did the lab follow to classify the item or restore a defaced serial number? Were photos, measurements, and intermediate steps documented?
  • Knowledge & Intent: Do the communications, workbench layout, and receipts suggest hobbyist learning and safe-storage—or manufacturing for transfer?
  • Possession: In shared homes or vehicles, who actually exercised control over the part or tools?

Common Fact Patterns (and Why They Matter)

  • Online “80%” kit with a jig: The state may argue the part crossed the line to a functional receiver; the defense will examine tool marks, milling depth, and whether critical cavities were actually completed.
  • 3D-printed receivers: Materials, print settings, and post-processing steps (e.g., inserts, reinforcement) matter. Not every printed object qualifies as a receiver.
  • Inherited or found parts: Constructive possession and knowledge can be weak where multiple people share a space.
  • Moved to California with unfinished parts: Rules here are not the same as in other states; the timeline of acquisition and any serialization steps you took will be central.

Evidence Development That Changes Outcomes

A weapons charges lawyer will move quickly to collect and preserve:

  • Purchase histories & vendor receipts (including order confirmations and packing slips).
  • Build diaries, range logs, and training certificates that show education and safe handling rather than distribution intent.
  • Photos of the workbench or storage area taken immediately after the search (when lawful to do so), plus descriptions of what officers moved.
  • Communications with engravers or vendors about serialization appointments, parts compatibility, or compliance questions.
  • Shipping labels & tracking that show what exactly was delivered (a part vs. a finished receiver).

This documentation helps ground the case in facts rather than assumptions.

Lab & Forensics: Methodology Matters

How a lab classifies a part—or attempts serial-number restoration—can be the fulcrum of the case. A California criminal defense attorney will typically request:

  • Photographic logs showing each step of restoration (chemical etching, magnetic particle inspection, micro-abrasion).
  • Calibration and reagent records to verify the technique was valid and properly applied.
  • Chain-of-custody documentation that accounts for the item from seizure to testing to storage.
  • Measurement sheets and feature checklists used to declare that a part met receiver status.
  • Test-firing or function assessments (if performed), and whether the lab altered the item to make it function.

Gaps in documentation—or techniques that deviate from accepted protocols—can weaken the state’s classification.

Possession, Intent, and Human Context

Unserialized-part cases often involve shared spaces, roommates, family members, or car passengers. A criminal lawyer will analyze:

  • Actual vs. constructive possession: proximity alone is not always control.
  • Knowledge: did you know the part met the legal definition of a receiver?
  • Intent: hobbyist learning and safe-storage efforts can look very different from manufacturing for sale or transfer.

Real-world context—employment, licensure, prior training, and efforts to comply—may influence charging decisions and case trajectory.

Practical Do’s and Don’ts (Right Now)

  • Do preserve paperwork: receipts, emails, chats with vendors/engravers, and shipping materials.
  • Do secure a written timeline: when you ordered, received, and worked on the item; which steps (if any) were completed; who had access.
  • Do not modify the item further after seizure or contact—additional changes can complicate classification.
  • Do not discuss details with officers without counsel present; even “clarifications” can be misinterpreted.
  • Do photograph the area (when lawful) to memorialize the scene and what tools were actually present.

How These Cases Are Typically Litigated

While every matter is unique, experienced counsel may:

  • File targeted suppression motions if the stop, search, or “plain view” seizure exceeded legal bounds.
  • Seek exclusion of classification or restoration results where protocols or documentation are deficient.
  • Challenge possession and knowledge in shared-access scenarios.
  • Distinguish between personal hobbyist conduct and allegations of manufacturing or transfer.
  • Address collateral issues (licensing, employment, immigration) as part of a comprehensive strategy.

None of this predicts a result; it explains how a firearm defense attorney California residents call in these situations evaluates the moving parts so you can make informed decisions.

Quick Answers to Common Client Questions

  • Do I have to serialize? It depends on the part, its state of completion, and timing. Requirements have changed over the years; counsel will map your facts to the rules that applied at each point.
  • What if I started the build before rules changed? The timeline matters. Document when each step occurred and what guidance you relied on.
  • Is 3D-printing a receiver automatically illegal? Not automatically; the legal question is whether the printed object meets the definition of a receiver or was possessed/used in a way the law prohibits.
  • What if the numbers were “restored” in the lab? Restoration methods must be reliable and documented. Technique, reagent use, and photographic records are reviewable.

If you are dealing with an unserialized frame, receiver, or “ghost gun” allegation, speaking with a California gun charge lawyer quickly can help protect your rights and guide what evidence to gather. For confidential help, contact Power Trial Lawyers at (888) 808-2179.

Prohibited-Person Possession (PC 29800)

When California alleges a “prohibited-person” firearm case, the charge usually appears as Penal Code § 29800—often called “felon-in-possession”—but the real fight is bigger than a label. These cases turn on two questions: (1) were you legally “prohibited” at the time, and (2) can the state truly prove possession and knowledge beyond a reasonable doubt? A seasoned California gun charge lawyer or weapons charges lawyer will track both questions from the first phone call so that every decision—what to say, what to gather, what to challenge—moves in a purposeful direction.

1) Was the “predicate” status accurate?

California’s databases are imperfect. Records get mis-coded; wobblers later reduced to misdemeanors may still display as felonies; out-of-county or out-of-state entries can be incomplete. Your defense team will typically:

  • Audit the predicate: Was the disqualifying conviction actually a felony at the time of possession? Was it a wobbler later reduced under a statute that affects firearm status? Did a court order modify or set aside the conviction?
  • Compare state and federal footprints: California and federal law do not always align; counsel will flag conflicts so you don’t step into unintended consequences.
  • Check dates and orders: Rights restoration efforts, dismissals, or relief granted after the alleged possession date may still matter—for context, equity, and potential negotiations.

This records work is not paperwork for its own sake; it can reshape charging decisions and how a judge evaluates the case.

2) Can the state actually prove possession and knowledge?

“Possession” is more than proximity. In apartments with roommates, shared vehicles, borrowed backpacks, and rideshares, the question becomes: Who controlled the firearm, who knew it was there, and what ties it to youspecifically? A firearm defense attorney California courts hear regularly will push on:

  • Actual vs. constructive possession: Was the gun on your person or in a place jointly used by others?
  • Knowledge: Are there fingerprints, DNA, statements, or credible evidence that you knew the firearm was present? Or is the state stacking inferences?
  • Search mechanics: Did officers lawfully open the container or case? Was the “plain view” claim manufactured by repositioning items? Was the stop prolonged past its original mission?

If the search was defective, a targeted motion can seek to exclude the firearm or narrow what the jury is allowed to hear. No promises—just a disciplined approach that matches remedy to defect.

Collateral realities that matter now

A PC 29800 allegation can ripple far beyond the courtroom. Many clients are licensed professionals, hold security clearances, or have immigration concerns. Early strategy should account for:

  • Licensure and employment: Reporting duties, board inquiries, and background checks.
  • Immigration: Firearms-related findings can trigger severe consequences; timing and charge selection are critical.
  • Housing and family: Protective orders, GVROs, and conditions of release can impact daily life.

A California criminal defense attorney who sees the whole field can coordinate the criminal case with these collateral stakes.

Practical next steps (without risking your defenses)

  • Do not explain facts to law enforcement without counsel present. Even “clarifications” can be used against you.
  • Preserve evidence and contacts: Names of passengers/roommates, text threads, photos of where items were found, and any video.
  • Write a private timeline for your legal team—how the stop or contact unfolded, who said what, and when.
  • Gather court papers related to old convictions or relief (minute orders, docket printouts, reduction or dismissal orders).

A focused paper trail can be the difference between “looks like possession” and “not provable.”

Assault-Weapon Allegations (PC 30605 / 30600)

Assault-weapon cases are technical and fact-dense. The statute doesn’t just say “gun = crime.” The state must prove that the firearm met specific feature-based or model-by-name definitions and that the configuration at the relevant time satisfied those definitions. That’s why these cases often hinge on measurements, parts, and chain-of-custody—not slogans.

What the state must establish

  • For possession (PC 30605): that the firearm as possessed had the required features or was banned by name.
  • For manufacture/transport/sale (PC 30600): additional intent and conduct elements—often requiring proof of more than mere possession.

A knowledgeable California gun charge lawyer will insist on answers to basic—but crucial—questions: Which feature, measured how, on which date, by whom, and documented where?

Common disputes that drive outcomes

  • Measurement & method: Pistol grip, folding stock, detachable magazine, overall length, and muzzle devices are not self-proving. How were they identified? Was a “flash suppressor” actually a brake? Were fixed-magazine modifications present?
  • Configuration at the time: Many rifles change configuration with aftermarket parts. The relevant question is what the firearm looked like when you possessed it—not what it looked like after officers field-stripped, transported, or stored it.
  • Chain-of-custody: Did anyone alter the weapon’s condition (intentionally or inadvertently) while it was in evidence? Are there photographs and logs at each step?
  • Expert qualifications: Who performed the classification? What training, references, and written protocols support their opinion? Are there photographs, caliper readings, and parts lists—or just conclusions?

These are not academic nitpicks. In court, proof is the product. Gaps and assumptions can be the difference between a felony posture and a more manageable outcome.

Evidence worth preserving immediately

  • Photographs and videos of the firearm’s configuration before any law-enforcement handling (if lawfully available to you).
  • Parts and purchase records: receipts, order confirmations, and packaging for muzzle devices, stocks, and magazine-locking components.
  • Gunsmith and range documentation: who installed what parts and when; range logs that show lawful, safe use.
  • Witness statements: the person who owned the part, performed the install, or loaned the accessory can clarify intent and configuration.

Real-world scenarios we see

  • Out-of-state move: A rifle lawful elsewhere is brought to California without realizing a particular feature triggers classification. The defense reconstructs configuration with receipts, photos, and expert inspection.
  • Aftermarket confusion: A device marketed as a “brake” is logged as a “flash suppressor.” Methodology and product documentation can matter.
  • Evidence handling issues: A weapon that arrived with a fixed-magazine part later appears with a detachable magazine. Chain-of-custody photos and logs become pivotal.

Straight answers to frequent questions

  • “Is my rifle automatically illegal?” Not automatically. Legality depends on specific features or model status and how the firearm was configured at the relevant time.
  • “Can parts or measurements be wrong?” Yes. Misidentification happens; correct classification requires measurements, photos, and a clear method.
  • “What if the gun changed while in police custody?” That’s a chain-of-custody issue to explore. Courts can limit or exclude conclusions that rely on altered configurations.
  • “Should I talk to detectives to clear this up?” Do not do so without counsel. Even well-intended explanations can close doors you want open.

Why early guidance matters

Early, informed decisions shape these cases—what to say (often, nothing), what to collect (paperwork, photos, witnesses), and what to challenge (search, classification, chain-of-custody). Speaking with a criminal lawyer who regularly handles firearms work can help you avoid avoidable mistakes and focus on the issues that actually decide outcomes. If you’re looking for a California gun charge lawyer or firearm defense attorney California residents rely on for high-stakes cases, Power Trial Lawyers is available to discuss your situation in confidence.

Call (888) 808-2179 to speak with a California criminal defense attorney today. You’ll get straightforward guidance about next steps—no sales pitch, no guarantees—just a clear plan tailored to your facts. If you prefer, ask to consult with a California criminal defense lawyer on our team for immediate triage.

FAQ: Firearms & Weapons Defense in Southern California

1) What should I do in the first 24 hours after a California gun arrest?

Stay silent, ask for a lawyer, and avoid explaining or “clearing things up.” Preserve evidence (photos, texts, receipts), write a private timeline for your attorney, and share names of witnesses. A firearm defense attorney California courts know can quickly request body-cam, dispatch logs, and property records.

2) Is carrying a concealed handgun (PC 25400) the same as carrying a loaded gun in public (PC 25850)?

No. PC 25400 focuses on concealment and knowing possession; PC 25850 requires a loaded gun in a public place. The elements, enhancements, and defenses differ. A weapons charges lawyer will separate what the state must prove under each statute.

3) Can police open my backpack, center console, or locked case during a traffic stop?

Not automatically. Scope depends on consent, probable cause, or a valid exception. “Plain view” does not allow manipulation to create visibility. Your lawyer may challenge any search that exceeded lawful bounds.

4) I moved to California with firearms I bought legally elsewhere. Am I at risk?

Possibly. California’s definitions, transport rules, and registration timelines differ from other states. If contacted by police, do not explain—consult a California criminal defense attorney to map your facts to California’s rules.

5) What if the gun was in a shared car or apartment?

Possession isn’t only about proximity. The state must connect you—through control, knowledge, fingerprints/DNA, or reliable statements—to the firearm. Constructive possession in shared spaces is often disputed.

6) What is a “ghost gun” case?

It usually involves an unserialized frame/receiver or a part the state claims qualifies as a receiver. Disputes center on when a part becomes a “firearm,” whether serialization was required, and how the lab classified or restored markings.

7) How do assault-weapon allegations (PC 30605/30600) get proven?

By features (e.g., pistol grip, folding stock, flash suppressor), overall configuration at the relevant time, or model-by-name status. Method, measurements, chain-of-custody, and expert qualifications are frequent battlegrounds.

8) I’m charged as a “prohibited person” (PC 29800). What does that mean?

It alleges possession by someone legally barred from possessing firearms. Two core questions: Was your “predicate” status accurate then (felony or mis-coded wobbler?), and can the state prove you knowingly possessed a firearm?

9) Can I be charged if the gun wasn’t mine?

The state must still prove possession and knowledge beyond a reasonable doubt. In rideshares, borrowed cars, or roommates’ rooms, those links can be weak without solid evidence.

10) Do CCW permits protect me from arrest?

A CCW helps but does not cover everything. Sensitive locations, storage/transport rules, ammunition/magazine issues, or alleged intoxication can still trigger arrests or charges.

11) What should I say to detectives if they “just want my side”?

Nothing without counsel. Even innocent explanations can be misunderstood. Politely assert your rights: “I’m invoking my right to remain silent and to an attorney.”

12) How fast will my case move in Los Angeles (Clara Shortridge Foltz CJC) or Orange County (Central Justice Center)?

Arraignments and early settings move quickly. Local practices vary by courthouse and department. Early attorney involvement protects defenses and sets the tone with the prosecutor.

13) Can a gun case be reduced to a non-gun offense?

Sometimes, depending on the facts, proof issues, and your background. Counsel may pursue diversion, deferred entry, or alternative counts. Each case is fact-specific; no outcome is guaranteed.

14) What evidence should I collect now?

Receipts, registration history, CCW or training documents, range logs, photos of where items were found, witness contacts, and any communications with vendors/engravers. This can help your lawyer reconstruct what truly happened.

15) Are “large-capacity magazine” allegations defensible?

They can be fact- and timing-dependent. Proof of acquisition date, configuration, and lawful exceptions (if any) are examined carefully.

16) What is a PC 1538.5 motion and why does it matter?

It’s a motion to suppress evidence obtained through unlawful searches or seizures. If granted, key evidence (like a firearm) may be excluded, which can change charging or trial posture.

17) How do Gun-Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs) interact with a criminal case?

GVROs can require immediate surrender and create prohibitions while a case is pending. Service, notice, and compliance timelines matter; missteps can create new allegations. Coordinate both tracks with counsel.

18) Will a firearms charge affect my professional license or immigration status?

It can. Many boards require reporting, and some firearms findings carry immigration consequences. Tell your lawyer about your licensing and status immediately so strategy accounts for collateral stakes.

19) My case involves a 3D-printed part. Does that automatically count as a firearm?

No. It depends on whether the printed item legally qualifies as a receiver and how it was used or possessed. Materials, dimensions, and function matter.

20) The lab “restored” a serial number. Is that conclusive?

Restoration methods must be reliable and documented. Defense may review reagent logs, photographs, and protocols and may consult independent experts.

21) Can I talk about my case on social media or text friends about it?

Don’t. Posts and messages are discoverable and can be taken out of context. Speak privately with your attorney.

22) What happens at the first court date (arraignment)?

You’ll hear the charges and enter a plea. Your lawyer may address release conditions, protective orders, and an initial discovery schedule.

23) How do you challenge “plain view” claims?

True plain view requires a lawful vantage point without manipulating objects. Body-cam, photographs, and credible timelines are used to test what officers could actually see.

24) I was just cited and released. Do I still need a lawyer now?

Yes. Pre-filing advocacy can affect whether charges are filed, how they’re framed, or whether alternatives are considered. Early action preserves evidence the state might not collect.

25) Can passengers or roommates help my case?

Potentially. Witnesses can clarify ownership, access, and who actually controlled the space or container where the firearm was found.

26) What’s the difference between misdemeanor and felony exposure in gun cases?

Some statutes are “wobblers” that can be filed either way. Filing level depends on facts like prior convictions, firearm status, and alleged conduct.

27) Will I have to surrender other firearms during my case?

Protective orders and GVROs can require relinquishment. Your lawyer can advise on compliance steps that also protect your legal position.

28) How do I pick the right lawyer for a firearms charge?

Look for experience with suppression motions, feature-classification disputes, local courthouse practice (CJC, Central Justice Center, etc.), and clear communication. Ask how they staff experts and investigators.

29) Can you help if my case is in Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, Santa Barbara, SLO, Imperial, or Kern?

Yes—Power Trial Lawyers regularly appears across Southern California and understands local filing and courtroom practices.

30) When should I call a lawyer?

Immediately. Early decisions shape outcomes. Call (888) 808-2179 for confidential guidance from a weapons charges lawyer today.

Client Reviews

Matthew is the most knowledgeable lawyer. I have worked with teams of lawyers and none of them were as knowledgeable and prompt as Matthew. I trust all of my company’s legal affairs with Matthew. He makes me rest easy knowing he is on it.

Michael

Matthew is the epitome of hard work and dedication, when it comes to his work. Matthew has helped me with all my contractual work needed to help me launch my start up. Matthew is honest, diligent and relentless.

Carol

Matthew was very responsive and caring for my case. He handled my case with efficiency and made sure to secure exactly what we wanted. He has represented my company previously and when we needed a lawyer, it was no question – we phoned Matthew!

Tony

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 Appeals and Litigation Attorney
Fill out the contact form or call us at (888) 808-2179 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message