Close

Articles Posted in Criminal Appeals

Updated:

Another Power Trial Lawyers, P.C. Client Is Resentenced Pursuant to SB 483 and Penal Code § 1170.03 | San Bernardino County

Another Power Trial Lawyers, P.C. client is fortunate to be successfully resentenced out of Riverside County pursuant to Senate Bill 483 and Penal Code § 1170.03. On April 15, 2022, after nearly 9-months of review, the California Superior Court of Rancho Cucamonga successfully resentenced a Power Trial Lawyers, P.C., sparing…

Updated:

Another Power Trial Lawyers, P.C. Client Resentenced; ABC7 and Other News Outlets Closely Follow His Release

ABC7 publishes an article covering California Criminal Appeals attorney, Matthew Barhoma’s work in a re-sentencing of his client pursuant to Penal Code 1170(d)(1) and AB 2942. The article highlights a recent success for Power Trial Lawyers, P.C., where the Firm successfully reduced a client’s sentence just mere 9 months after…

Updated:

Attorney Matthew Barhoma appears on CourtTV for Analysis on Sentencing Laws and Recent Developments

California Criminal Appeals Lawyer Comments on Recent Criminal Justice Headlines Recently, Attorney Matthew Barhoma, appeared on Court TV to discuss several of the nation’s highest-profile criminal cases.  Ahmaud Arbery Earlier this year, three White men who were previously convicted for the February 2020 murder of Ahmaud Arbery were sentenced by…

Updated:

Power Trial Lawyers, P.C. CLIENT, EARL SNODDY, RESENTENCED AFTER 9 MONTHS OF RETAINING THE FIRM. CLIENT CASE FEATURED ON ABC7, KTLA, FOX11 AND MORE

Power Trial Lawyers, P.C., client, Earl Snoddy, is resentenced by the state court, making him a free man just 9 months after retaining Power Trial Lawyers, P.C., the leading California Appeals and Post-Conviction law firm. Mr. Earl Snoddy spent 27-years behind bars. Power Trial Lawyers, P.C. successfully recalled his sentence…

Updated:

California’s Three Strikes Law

While California is on the cutting-edge of criminal justice reform, in large part, this is due to the extremely harsh sentencing laws enacted in decades past. Most notably, California’s three strikes law, codified in Penal Code § 667, provides for increasingly harsh sentences for those who have been convicted of…

Updated:

Certificates of Rehabilitation Are an Underutilized Resource for Many Former California Inmates

The effects of a felony conviction are severe and remain with you for life. However, by obtaining a certificate of rehabilitation, inmates can regain many of the liberties they’ve been deprived of due to their conviction. While certificates of rehabilitation are not new, by any means, they are underutilized, in…

Updated:

SB 775 May Help You Reduce Your Manslaughter and Attempted Murder Convictions, Much Like SB 1437

Senate Bill 775 passed the senate and the assembly this month, on September 10, 2021. It has been passed off to Governor Newsom for final signature. If signed, this bill will help reduce the sentence of those convicted of attempted murder and manslaughter, if they meet the SB 775 criteria.…

Updated:

The Breakdown of California’s New Sentencing Enhancement Laws

Below are recent changes introduced by way of a Senate Bill: Senate Bill 180 Effective: January 1, 2018. Notable Changes: Previously, if you were convicted of a drug trafficking offense, the judge could impose consecutive three-year enhancements for each prior drug trafficking offense. Under SB 180, only those prior offenses…

Updated:

State and Federal Writs for Habeas Corpus, Generally Explained by Leading Criminal Appeals Lawyer

The writ of habeas corpus, or the “Great Writ” as it is also known, is a powerful tool. The writ of habeas corpus calls for the review of an individual’s incarceration, requiring the government to justify why it is holding someone in custody. When properly used, a writ of habeas…

Updated:

The Importance of Franklin Hearings for Young People Convicted of Serious Crimes

A Franklin hearing is a procedural mechanism that allows a person convicted of a serious crime to present evidence of their youthfulness, not to excuse their actions but to put them into context. Franklin hearings arose out of a 2016 case involving a 16-year-old boy who shot and killed another…

Contact Us
Live Chat