Power Trial Lawyers — Los Angeles & Orange County Criminal Defense & Restraining Order Attorneys

Power Trial Lawyers

When you’re arrested, charged, or served with a restraining order in Southern California, the next decisions you make will shape your future. Power Trial Lawyers is a trial-ready, client-focused defense firm built for Los Angeles County and Orange County courtrooms. We move quickly to preserve evidence, control the narrative, and execute a courthouse-specific plan tailored to your judge, your prosecutor, and your goals. We combine deep local experience with relentless advocacy so your case is handled with speed, precision, and discretion. Free, confidential consultation: (888) 808-2179. Available 24/7.

Why Clients Across Los Angeles & Orange County Choose Us

The law is universal; the way it’s applied is local. Calendars, filing habits, diversion pathways, evidentiary expectations, and even courtroom culture vary by courthouse and department. We appear regularly in Los Angeles Superior Court and Orange County Superior Court, and we know how cases are actually won in CCB (Downtown LA), Airport/LAX, Van Nuys, Compton, Long Beach, Torrance, Pasadena, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Norwalk, West Covina—and in Central (Santa Ana), West (Westminster), Harbor (Newport Beach), North (Fullerton), and Lamoreaux (Orange). That local fluency, combined with trial credibility, lets us negotiate from strength or try your case to verdict when needed. Media features (ABC, CNN, Forbes, Los Angeles Times, CourtTV, Law&Crime) reflect the rigor behind our work—but results for clients are what matter most.

Call now: (888) 808-2179. Same-day strategy sessions. Discreet and judgment-free.

Criminal Defense — Los Angeles & Orange County

We defend misdemeanors and serious felonies with a trial-first posture. Every plan starts with your facts, your department, and your objectives. Below are core categories we handle across CCB, Airport/LAX, Van Nuys, Compton, Long Beach, Torrance, Pasadena, Norwalk, West Covina, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Central, West, Harbor, North, and Lamoreaux.

Domestic violence allegations move faster than most people expect and carry immediate, collateral consequences: custody complications, firearm prohibitions, and employment issues—on top of potential jail and mandatory classes. In Los Angeles (CCB, Van Nuys, Compton, Airport/LAX) and Orange County (Central, Harbor, West, North, Lamoreaux), prosecutors frequently file even when a complaining witness hesitates. We act immediately to shut down the momentum against you. That means preserving digital evidence (texts, DMs, voicemails), securing independent witness statements, and obtaining 911 audio or nearby surveillance before it disappears. We test the state’s story against motive (custody leverage, immigration, lease disputes), credibility (prior inconsistent statements, intoxication, bias), and lawful defenses(self-defense, mutual combat, accident, lack of traumatic condition).

We also coordinate with restraining order practice. A criminal case may sit alongside a DVRO at Lamoreaux or Stanley Mosk/CCB. Presenting a consistent theory across both forums protects you from cross-pollination risks (e.g., admissions in one proceeding harming the other). Where appropriate, we pursue pre-filing advocacy to shape charges—or avoid them—by delivering targeted mitigation (treatment starts, verified counseling, character letters with substance, proof of stable housing/work). Some departments entertain informal diversion or non-criminal dispositions for first-time, low-level battery cases; others do not. Knowing the difference avoids squandering leverage. If trial is the right play, we try the case. If negotiation can capture a future-proof result (dismissal, lesser non-DV offense, no-firearm finding where lawful), we execute the plan that secures your long-term goals.

Charged or investigated for DV in LA or OC? Call (213) 800-7664—early evidence wins DV cases.

DUI & DMV Hearings (VC § 23152/23153) — 10-Day Deadline

A DUI arrest starts two cases: the criminal matter and the DMV license action. In Los Angeles and Orange County you have 10 calendar days to request a DMV hearing or risk automatic suspension. We handle both fronts. In court (Airport/LAX, CCB, West, Harbor, Central, North), we attack the stop (no articulable suspicion), the breath/blood procedure (calibration, partition ratio, fermentation, storage), rising BAC, and officer credibility (report cut-and-paste, bodycam contradictions). For VC § 23153 (DUI with injury), we add crash reconstruction and causation defenses to sever intoxication from injury.

At DMV, the standard is different—but beatable. We subpoena the officer when strategic, challenge the “official duty presumption,” and exploit analytical gaps the state often overlooks. Commercial driver? Under-21? Alleged refusal? We tailor defenses to the license class and allegation, including necessity and medical explanations (GERD, ketosis) that mimic impairment. For first-time, low-BAC cases in particular departments, we explore dispositions that avoid criminal convictions or reduce long-tail consequences. For repeat DUIs, we front-load treatment, ignition interlock compliance, and abstinence proof to craft persuasive mitigation.

License, liberty, and livelihood intersect in DUI. Call (888) 808-2179 within 10 days to protect your driving privileges and start your defense.

Assault, Battery & ADW (PC § 240, § 242, § 245; GBI § 12022.7)

Assault and battery cases swing on intent, identity, and proportionality. In LA and OC courts, a bar-fight misdemeanor can morph into a felony ADW with a GBI enhancement if medical records show significant injury, or if an object is characterized as a “deadly weapon.” We begin with the scene: layout, lighting, angles for cameras, 911 timing, ER notes, intoxication, and third-party witnesses. We examine whether the alleged “weapon” functionally qualifies under PC § 245 and whether force used was reasonable under self-defense or defense of others. Where mutual combat applies, we frame consent and escalation accurately.

Department culture matters: Compton and Long Beach juries often evaluate street-context differently than Santa Monica or Beverly Hills juries; Central and Harbor have distinct evidentiary preferences on medical proof. We calibrate to the trier of fact and the judge’s evidentiary style. Our goals vary: for strike-eligible filings, convert to non-strike alternatives (simple assault or misdemeanor battery); for over-charged ADW, strip the GBI and weapon elements; for misidentification, push to trial and dismantle the ID through cross and bodycam contradictions. Where clients face immigration exposure, we target safe-harbor pleas that avoid crimes involving moral turpitude or aggravated felony pitfalls. Strategy is personal—and local.

Firearms & Weapons (PC § 25400, § 25850, § 29800, § 30605)

California gun charges are complex and politically sensitive. We defend concealed carry without a license (PC § 25400), loaded carry in public (PC § 25850), felon/prohibited person possession (PC § 29800), and assault weapon allegations (PC § 30605). In LA (CCB, Airport, Van Nuys) and OC (Central, Harbor, West), search/seizure issues dominate: vehicle stops that expand into trunks, pat-downs that exceed Terry, probation/parole conditions misapplied, residence entries justified by dubious “exigent” claims. We litigate suppression aggressively; exclusion of the firearm ends the case.

Possession is nuanced: actual vs. constructive, proximity vs. dominion, shared spaces, and fingerprints/DNA—or lack thereof. For magazines and configured parts, we dispute technical classifications and operability. First-time, non-violentdefendants may qualify for diversion or non-custodial outcomes in certain departments; others require stiffer showings (training, safe-storage plans, community-based service). When a criminal case overlaps a GVRO, we coordinate so statements in one forum don’t injure the other, and we time stipulations to protect broader rights where the law allows. Our aim is targeted: end the case on constitutional grounds, or land a result that protects immigration, employment, and civil rights long-term.

Theft, Robbery & Burglary (PC § 484, § 487, § 459, § 211; Shoplifting § 459.5)

From petty theft to first-degree residential burglary and robbery (a strike), these cases turn on intent and identification. In Norwalk, West Covina, Central, North, we regularly confront loss-prevention narratives, inconsistent store-camera timelines, and suggestive lineups. For burglary, we target entry intent—was the purpose to commit a felony/theft at the moment of entry? For robbery, we separate fear/force from mere taking, dismantle “immediate presence,” or show after-the-fact force not rising to PC § 211.

Motions to suppress (bad detentions, unconstitutional searches), value disputes (to move from grand to petty), and strike mitigation are key. Shoplifting (PC § 459.5) can be diversion-eligible; we pair restitution with counseling or theft-awareness programming to close cases without convictions where lawfully possible. For cases headed to trial, we use expert testimony on memory and perception, attack chain of custody, and expose investigative gaps (failure to collect prints/DNA, missing video angles). Where immigration is implicated, we negotiate theft-safe pleas to protect status. The goal: clear the charge, collapse the strike, or secure a resolution that keeps your life intact.

Drug Possession, Sales & Trafficking (HS § 11350, § 11351, § 11352, § 11359, § 11378)

Drug cases live or die on search/seizure and intent. We challenge stops, warrants, and consent—vehicle sniffs without proper predicates, “plain view” that isn’t, residence entries without valid exigency. For possession for sale (HS § 11351, § 11378) and transport/sales (HS § 11352), we attack indicia of sales (cash bundling, packaging, scales) and use defense experts to explain personal-use patterns. Confidential informant reliability, wiretap integrity, and lab procedures are fair game. In LA (CCB, Airport, Long Beach) and OC (Central, West, North), we aggressively litigate motions that suppress the evidence or box the state into personal-use outcomes.

Diversion or treatment alternatives (including mental-health pathways) exist in some departments for eligible clients—we front-load treatment, negative tests, housing, and employment documentation to win them. For trafficking or multi-defendant conspiracies, we separate your role from the larger enterprise and exploit discovery shortfalls. We also defend related asset forfeiture actions to protect vehicles, cash, and devices. The measure of success may be dismissal; it may also be a non-custodial or record-protective outcome that safeguards your work, license, and immigration status. We pursue the result that secures your future.

Fraud & Financial Crimes (PC § 530.5, § 470, § 476a, § 487; Insurance/Benefits Fraud)

White-collar cases demand patience, precision, and proactive narrative control. We defend identity theft, forgery, check/credit card fraud, embezzlement, grand theft by false pretenses, insurance/benefits fraud, and contractor/healthcare billing claims across LA and OC. Our approach is forensic: reconcile bank data with device logs, metadata, IP paths, and third-party vendor records; expose alternative culprits; and challenge the admissibility of spreadsheets and summaries unmoored from foundational business records. We press prosecuting agencies (DA, City Attorney, DOI) on loss calculations inflated by speculation or civil damages.

Local disposition practices matter. Some departments will entertain restitution-first resolutions; others prioritize convictions. We calibrate accordingly, often using global settlement frameworks that address criminal exposure, restitution, and professional licensure in one package. For clients with immigration concerns, we target pleas that avoid CIMT designations. Where trial is necessary, we simplify complex accounting into juror-intuitive stories that undercut intent to defraud. The endgame: contain the case, repair the record, and keep your life moving.

Sex Crimes Defense (PC § 243.4, § 261, § 288, § 314)

Sex-crime allegations can devastate reputations before any evidence is tested. We defend sexual battery, rape, lewd acts, and related charges with total discretion. Consent, credibility, and forensics are the pillars. We secure complete discovery (SART kits, chain of custody, device extractions), pursue third-party communications that contradict the narrative, and insist on rigorous Evidence Code compliance for prior or “me too” acts. In LA and OC, law enforcement sometimes shortcuts digital context; we fill those gaps with defense-led analysis.

We manage parallel civil exposure and media risk, structure no-contact protocols that protect you without conceding liability, and litigate bail and protective orders narrowly. For trial, we deploy experts on memory, intoxication, and forensic limitations to educate the jury. When negotiation is smarter, we pursue outcomes that avoid registration where the law allows and mitigate long-term collateral effects. Privacy and dignity are non-negotiable while we fight for your freedom.

Probation Violations & Bench Warrants (PC § 1203.2)

A probation violation or warrant can spiral quickly. We move to recall warrants, stabilize custody exposure, and present a concrete compliance plan that gives the court confidence to keep you in the community: updated treatment, verified work/school, restitution schedules, and sponsor letters that carry weight in your department. In LA and OC, some judges welcome structured second chances; others require granular proof. We provide it. Where the alleged violation is contestable, we litigate—with an eye toward evidentiary burdens and hearsay limits. The objective is simple: protect your freedom and get you back on track.

Restraining Orders — Los Angeles & Orange County

Restraining order hearings are mini-trials with real consequences for housing, work, travel, custody, and firearm rights. We represent petitioners and respondents in DVRO, CHRO, GVRO, WVRO, and EARO matters throughout Lamoreaux, CCB/Stanley Mosk, Central, Harbor, West, North, Van Nuys, Compton, Airport/LAX.

Domestic Violence Restraining Orders (DVRO)

DVROs are often filed alongside criminal cases—and mishandling one can damage the other. In Lamoreaux (Orange) and LA family/criminal departments, we build a theory-driven case: a clean timeline, authenticated messages/photos, third-party corroboration, and targeted impeachment that remains respectful yet decisive. For respondents, we dismantle exaggerations, expose ulterior motives (custody leverage, housing pressure), and argue for narrowly tailored orders—or outright denial—based on actual risk. For petitioners, we move fast to secure Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) with persuasive declarations, police/medical attachments where applicable, and a hearing plan that anticipates common defenses.

We are meticulous about firearm implications and Brady issues. Where law permits, we structure compliance that preserves broader rights and avoids downstream traps. Evidence presentation is calibrated to the judge’s style: some departments reward compact, well-organized exhibit binders; others want live testimony first. We know the difference. The goal is protection where warranted—or relief from overbroad, life-altering orders where it is not.

Civil Harassment Restraining Orders (CHRO) — CCP § 527.6

Between neighbors, roommates, ex-friends, and business contacts, CHROs can become proxy battles for noise, parking, HOA, or money disputes. Courts in Central, Harbor, West, North, Van Nuys look for clear and convincing evidenceof harassment—unlawful violence, credible threats, or a course of conduct that seriously alarms and serves no legitimate purpose. For respondents, we demonstrate lawful reasons for contact, reframe the petitioner’s narrative with neutral facts (security logs, emails, geo-data, building records), and undercut “course of conduct” with gaps and benign explanations. For petitioners, we assemble consistent, timestamped evidence and third-party corroboration to prove that intervention is necessary.

We often negotiate mutual stay-aways or specific-location restrictions when full orders are unnecessary but peace is essential. Where trial is inevitable, we treat it like one: direct, cross, impeachment, and exhibits sequenced to the department’s expectation. Overbroad orders are trimmed; meritless petitions are denied; legitimate safety concerns are enforced.

Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVRO)

GVROs are surgical tools aimed at firearm access. They can be sought ex parte and extended for years. In LA and OC, departments expect tight facts showing dangerousness and a nexus to firearms. For respondents, we contest the predicate—no credible threat, no recent acts; we present safe-storage and compliance histories; and we challenge hearsay or speculative evidence. We also scrutinize how police obtained firearms or statements—if constitutional lines were crossed, we litigate.

For petitioners (including families), we prepare factual, unemotional showings that meet statutory elements without overreaching, sometimes proposing narrow alternatives (limited duration, specific storage) where appropriate. When a criminal case exists in parallel, we coordinate to avoid self-incrimination traps and preserve defenses. Outcome targets: deny or narrowly tailor orders for respondents; secure appropriately limited orders for petitioners where public safety truly demands it.

Workplace Violence Restraining Orders (WVRO)

Employers file WVROs to protect employees from credible threats or violence. In Central, West, Harbor, North, courts expect documented incidents, swift employer action, and proportionate relief. For respondents, we emphasize lawful speech vs. threats, contextualize workplace conflicts as HR/discipline issues rather than violence, and highlight absence of actual danger. For employers, we compile incident reports, video, HR memos, and third-party statements into a streamlined, persuasive packet that meets statutory standards without punishing protected activity. Balanced orders that keep people safe and respect lawful conduct are the sweet spot; we design and argue for them.

Elder/Dependent Adult Restraining Orders (EARO)

EAROs protect seniors and dependent adults from abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation. These cases are sensitive and often intertwined with family dynamics. For respondents, we present caregiving records, banking controls, medication logs, and third-party validations (home-health, social worker notes) to prove no abuse and adequate care. For petitioners, we act urgently to secure orders supported by medical records, APS involvement, and clear financial trails. Courts across Lamoreaux, Central, North want concise evidence and concrete safety plans; we deliver both.

Los Angeles County — Criminal Defense & Restraining Orders

Los Angeles County is vast, fast-moving, and unforgiving toward the unprepared. At Clara Shortridge Foltz (CCB), felony calendars move quickly from arraignment to preliminary hearing; Airport/LAX has unique DUI filing patterns; Van Nuys, Compton, Long Beach, Torrance, Pasadena, Norwalk, West Covina, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills each have nuanced departmental practices and personalities. We understand how particular judges view bail/supervised release, what a given DA unit tends to offer—or withhold—on domestic violence, firearms, theft, and drug cases, and how to present mitigation that actually moves the needle. In restraining order litigation—DVROs, CHROs, GVROs, WVROs—we prepare as if for mini-trial: timelines, exhibits, impeachment, and witness order that persuades that department, not an abstract audience. From LAPD and LASD reports to city-attorney filings, we know the evidentiary pitfalls and how to exploit or cure them. We meet urgency with action: evidence holds, investigator assignments, DMV hearing requests, immediate contact with the DA or City Attorney when it helps—and strategic silence when it doesn’t.

Orange County — Criminal Defense & Restraining Orders

Orange County courts run tight ships with firm expectations. Central Justice Center (Santa Ana), West (Westminster), Harbor (Newport Beach), North (Fullerton), and Lamoreaux (Orange) each apply procedural rules with crisp efficiency. Knowing which departments seriously consider early dismissal or alternative dispositions—and which require a fully developed evidentiary presentation—saves clients time, money, and stress. We regularly engage with OCSD, Irvine PD, Santa Ana PD, Anaheim PD, and city attorneys across the county. In DVRO practice at Lamoreaux, we calibrate to family-law evidentiary preferences; for CHROs and WVROs in civil departments, we anchor our presentations to CCP § 527.6 standards and local proof rhythms. In criminal matters—from DUI and domestic violenceto firearms, theft/burglary/robbery, and drug sales—we prepare like trial is tomorrow while positioning you for the best lawful outcome today.

If your case is in LA or OC, we’ve likely been in that department this month. Call (888) 808-2179.

Restraining Orders — Los Angeles & Orange County

Restraining order hearings are mini-trials with real consequences for housing, work, travel, custody, and firearm rights. We represent petitioners and respondents in DVRO, CHRO, GVRO, WVRO, and EARO matters throughout Lamoreaux, CCB/Stanley Mosk, Central, Harbor, West, North, Van Nuys, Compton, Airport/LAX.

Domestic Violence Restraining Orders (DVRO)

DVROs are often filed alongside criminal cases—and mishandling one can damage the other. In Lamoreaux (Orange) and LA family/criminal departments, we build a theory-driven case: a clean timeline, authenticated messages/photos, third-party corroboration, and targeted impeachment that remains respectful yet decisive. For respondents, we dismantle exaggerations, expose ulterior motives (custody leverage, housing pressure), and argue for narrowly tailored orders—or outright denial—based on actual risk. For petitioners, we move fast to secure Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) with persuasive declarations, police/medical attachments where applicable, and a hearing plan that anticipates common defenses.

We are meticulous about firearm implications and Brady issues. Where law permits, we structure compliance that preserves broader rights and avoids downstream traps. Evidence presentation is calibrated to the judge’s style: some departments reward compact, well-organized exhibit binders; others want live testimony first. We know the difference. The goal is protection where warranted—or relief from overbroad, life-altering orders where it is not.

Civil Harassment Restraining Orders (CHRO) — CCP § 527.6

Between neighbors, roommates, ex-friends, and business contacts, CHROs can become proxy battles for noise, parking, HOA, or money disputes. Courts in Central, Harbor, West, North, Van Nuys look for clear and convincing evidenceof harassment—unlawful violence, credible threats, or a course of conduct that seriously alarms and serves no legitimate purpose. For respondents, we demonstrate lawful reasons for contact, reframe the petitioner’s narrative with neutral facts (security logs, emails, geo-data, building records), and undercut “course of conduct” with gaps and benign explanations. For petitioners, we assemble consistent, timestamped evidence and third-party corroboration to prove that intervention is necessary.

We often negotiate mutual stay-aways or specific-location restrictions when full orders are unnecessary but peace is essential. Where trial is inevitable, we treat it like one: direct, cross, impeachment, and exhibits sequenced to the department’s expectation. Overbroad orders are trimmed; meritless petitions are denied; legitimate safety concerns are enforced.

Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVRO)

GVROs are surgical tools aimed at firearm access. They can be sought ex parte and extended for years. In LA and OC, departments expect tight facts showing dangerousness and a nexus to firearms. For respondents, we contest the predicate—no credible threat, no recent acts; we present safe-storage and compliance histories; and we challenge hearsay or speculative evidence. We also scrutinize how police obtained firearms or statements—if constitutional lines were crossed, we litigate.

For petitioners (including families), we prepare factual, unemotional showings that meet statutory elements without overreaching, sometimes proposing narrow alternatives (limited duration, specific storage) where appropriate. When a criminal case exists in parallel, we coordinate to avoid self-incrimination traps and preserve defenses. Outcome targets: deny or narrowly tailor orders for respondents; secure appropriately limited orders for petitioners where public safety truly demands it.

Workplace Violence Restraining Orders (WVRO)

Employers file WVROs to protect employees from credible threats or violence. In Central, West, Harbor, North, courts expect documented incidents, swift employer action, and proportionate relief. For respondents, we emphasize lawful speech vs. threats, contextualize workplace conflicts as HR/discipline issues rather than violence, and highlight absence of actual danger. For employers, we compile incident reports, video, HR memos, and third-party statements into a streamlined, persuasive packet that meets statutory standards without punishing protected activity. Balanced orders that keep people safe and respect lawful conduct are the sweet spot; we design and argue for them.

Elder/Dependent Adult Restraining Orders (EARO)

EAROs protect seniors and dependent adults from abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation. These cases are sensitive and often intertwined with family dynamics. For respondents, we present caregiving records, banking controls, medication logs, and third-party validations (home-health, social worker notes) to prove no abuse and adequate care. For petitioners, we act urgently to secure orders supported by medical records, APS involvement, and clear financial trails. Courts across Lamoreaux, Central, North want concise evidence and concrete safety plans; we deliver both.

Service Areas & Courthouses

Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, West LA, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Hollywood, Inglewood, Compton, Long Beach, Torrance, Pasadena, Glendale, Burbank, Van Nuys, West Covina, Norwalk, Palmdale, Lancaster. Regular appearances at CCB (Downtown LA), Airport/LAX, Van Nuys, Compton, Long Beach, Torrance, Pasadena, Norwalk, West Covina, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills.

Orange County: Santa Ana, Anaheim, Irvine, Newport Beach, Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach, Garden Grove, Westminster, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Tustin, Orange, Buena Park, Mission Viejo, Laguna Beach. Regular appearances at Central (Santa Ana), West (Westminster), Harbor (Newport Beach), North (Fullerton), Lamoreaux (Orange).

Representative Results

(**Past results don’t guarantee future outcomes.)

  • Los Angeles County: Negotiated a 25-to-life exposure down to one year.
  • Los Angeles County: Defeated restraining order and restored firearm rights.
  • Orange County: Won and renewed DVROs; defeated improperly sought orders.
  • Ventura County: Appeal remanded for resentencing.
  • San Bernardino County: Third-strike reduced to 18 months.
  • Multiple counties: Resentencing wins under PC § 1172.6 and PC § 1172.75.

What Happens When You Call Us Today

We don’t hand you a brochure. We triage, plan, and act. Evidence holds go out. Investigators are assigned. DMV hearings are requested. We map your department, your judge, and your prosecutor, then choose the path—quiet mitigation, targeted negotiation, or rapid motions practice—that best protects you. You get direct, clear communication and realistic expectations—with the confidence of a team that is in these courtrooms every week.

Power Trial Lawyers — Los Angeles & Orange County Criminal Defense and Restraining Order Attorneys
Free Consultation: (213) 800-7664Available 24/7 • Discreet. Strategic. Trial-ready.

Client Reviews

Matthew is the most knowledgeable lawyer. I have worked with teams of lawyers and none of them were as knowledgeable and prompt as Matthew. I trust all of my company’s legal affairs with Matthew. He makes me rest easy knowing he is on it.

Michael

Matthew is the epitome of hard work and dedication, when it comes to his work. Matthew has helped me with all my contractual work needed to help me launch my start up. Matthew is honest, diligent and relentless.

Carol

Matthew was very responsive and caring for my case. He handled my case with efficiency and made sure to secure exactly what we wanted. He has represented my company previously and when we needed a lawyer, it was no question – we phoned Matthew!

Tony

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 Appeals and Litigation Attorney
Fill out the contact form or call us at (213) 800-7664 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message